Analytic Frameworks for Assessing Dialogic Argumentation in Online Learning Environments
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Analytic Frameworks for Assessing Dialogic Argumentation in Online Learning Environments
Over the last decade, researchers have developed sophisticated online learning environments to support students engaging in argumentation. This review first considers the range of functionalities incorporated within these online environments. The review then presents five categories of analytic frameworks focusing on (1) formal argumentation structure, (2) normative quality, (3) nature and func...
متن کاملDesigning collaborative learning model in online learning environments
Introduction: Most online learning environments are challenging for the design of collaborative learning activities to achieve high-level learning skills. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to design and validate a model for collaborative learning in online learning environments. Methods: The research method used in this study was a mixed method, including qualitative content analysis and...
متن کاملRepresenting dialogic argumentation
Dialogic argumentation is a crucial component in many computational domains, and forms a core component of argumentation theory. This paper compares two approaches to dialogue that have grown from two different disciplines; the descriptive–normative approach of applied philosophy, and the formal, implemented approach of computer science. The commonalities between the approaches are explored in ...
متن کاملA Pilot Study in Using Argumentation Frameworks for Online Debates
We describe a pilot study in using argumentation frameworks obtained from an online debate to evaluate positions expressed in the debate. This pilot study aims at exploring the richness of Computational Argumentation methods and techniques for evaluating arguments to reason with the output of Argument Mining. It uses a hand-generated graphical representation of the debate as an intermediate rep...
متن کاملAssessing Arguments in the Abstract: Some Problems with Argumentation Frameworks
Argumentation frameworks are logic systems that assess collections of conflicting arguments generated from a set of potentially inconsistent factual and rule-based premises. Argumentationframeworks weredevelopedinresponsetocriticisms that traditional formal logic did not do justice to the adversarial nature of legal reasoning, and that it ignored the problems caused by the ambiguity of language...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Educational Psychology Review
سال: 2007
ISSN: 1040-726X,1573-336X
DOI: 10.1007/s10648-007-9050-7